
Animal
Experimentation:
Chimpanzee experiments.
Knight 2007
Knight A. The poor contribution
of chimpanzee experiments to biomedical progress. J Appl Anim Welf Sci
2007;10(4):281-308.
Request.
ABSTRACT
Biomedical research on captive chimpanzees incurs substantial nonhuman
animal welfare, ethical, and financial costs that advocates claim result in
substantial advancements in biomedical knowledge. However, demonstrating
minimal contribution toward the advancement of biomedical knowledge
generally, subsequent papers did not cite 49.5% (47/95), of 95 experiments
randomly selected from a population of 749 published worldwide between 1995
and 2004. Only 14.7% (14/95) were cited by 27 papers that abstracts
indicated described well-developed methods for combating human diseases.
However, detailed examination of these medical papers revealed that in vitro
studies, human clinical and epidemiological studies, molecular assays and
methods, and genomic studies contributed most to their development. No
chimpanzee study made an essential contribution, or, in most cases, a
significant contribution of any kind, to the development of the medical
method described. The approval of these experiments indicates a failure of
the ethics committee system. The demonstrable lack of benefit of most
chimpanzee experimentation and its profound animal welfare and bioethical
costs indicate that a ban is warranted in those remaining countries—notably
the United States—that continue to conduct it.
|
|
Veterinarian Andrew Knight BSc., BVMS, CertAW, MRCVS, is the Founder, Director and web designer of Animal Consultants International. He is an expert on humane alternatives to harmful animal use in education, animal experimentation, and vegetarian companion animal diets. An active animal advocate since 1995, he has extensive public speaking, media, research and writing experience. |